Blog

Hyperbolic Tessellation Generator … M. C. Escher might have loved this!

Sunday, 30 November 2025 by Bruce Rawles

I recently found this post on Facebook:

FaceBook post: Hyperbolic tesselations made with Python code generated by Gemini 3

It immediately reminded me of some similar images that inspired me decades ago by M.C. Escher, such as “Circle Limit I‘ (a woodcut dated November 1958) and this image from a post earlier this year:

Fellow geometer, David Joyner, recently suggested exploring Python and Blender to make more accurate geometric images with AI and/or automation tools, so that may be my next dive into geometric experimentation, dusting off my decades-neglected programming skills; various projects and dabblings with FORTRAN, Pascal, BASIC, C, HyperTalk, Lingo, HTML, CSS, PHP, JavaScript, POVRay, MegaPOV, and a few others.

Meanwhile, to whet my interest, I googled and easily found what appears to be the source code for the first image. My to-do list now has an attempt to replicate these geometric hyperbolic tessellations and try a few of my own using this resource on GitHub. It appears that I may need to complete some preliminary Python tutorials first; I’ll try using the W3Schools Python tutorial. If you have other resources you would recommend, contact me.

Here are a couple of examples from the GitHub source page:

A few German sacred geometry books available for shipping costs only

Sunday, 2 November 2025 by Bruce Rawles

Update 2 November 2025: We’ve been back in Oregon for a few weeks, and I still have a handful of German books to find homes for, so I’m re-dating this post in case anyone would like to purchase a book for only my shipping costs!

Update 21 July 2024: We’ve been in Arizona for exactly a year today, and I still have a handful of German books to find homes for, so I’m re-dating this post in case anyone would like to purchase a book for only my shipping costs!

(Originally published 25Jun2023):

We’re making good progress toward moving to Arizona (mid-July 2023), so I’m anticipating having more time to do in-depth posts after our move. Meanwhile, I’d still like to lighten our load and not move these books yet another time… I’m offering (until mid-July, while supplies last) – limited supply; limited offer) asking only for my shipping costs (US only) or free if you happen to be ~~on the central Oregon coast and can pick them up here in Yachats before we move!~~ in the ~~Tucson, AZ,~~ Portland, OR metro area, and can pick them up.

German sacred geometry books are available for shipping only (for a limited time!)

I have a handful of both of my German-translated books:

(If you live in Germany, you’ll probably want to order the Bewusst malen – Heilige Geometrie book, still in print, directly from the publisher, Silberschnur Verlag, since the shipping from the USA to Germany is likely more than buying it locally.)

If you speak German or know someone who does and has the least interest in geometry, I am offering special FREE books (very limited supply) of both of these books if you cover my postage costs. If you live near ~~Yachats, Oregon, Green Valley, Arizona,~~ Hillsboro, Oregon, you can pick them up here and skip the postage expense. For details on these limited-time, limited-supply books, contact me.

Note that you don’t have to be able to read or understand German to enjoy either of these books, as they are both lavishly illustrated – FAR more imagery than text. Also, each copy of the out-of-print MDHG book has a unique set of die-cut fold-up models of the 5 Platonic Solids (included behind the back cover) that make a neat mobile if you add your own thread.

Please contact me ~~before mid-July 2023~~ if you are interested in this special offer!

Here are a few more interesting geometry-related links (videos) that have crossed my path recently; several short introductory videos that add some useful and interesting additions to commonly cited facts:

Golden Spiral Symbol – What Does It Mean?
What Makes the Golden Spiral Symbol Special?
What is Sacred Geometry? (evidently using an AI-generated voice/script?)
How Does the Golden Spiral Relate to Sacred Geometry?
What is the Meaning of the Golden Spiral?
What are Some Examples of the Golden Spiral?
What is the Fibonacci Sequence?
… and several others…

Iridescent Platonic Solids: a quick AI generation experiment

Saturday, 1 November 2025 by Bruce Rawles

I just tried a quick experiment with ChatGPT to see what it would generate with the prompts below. When we visited Oaxaca, Mexico, a decade or two ago, we were inspired by the colorful carved and painted “alebrijes”. We brought home a few souvenirs, so I started with this whimsical idea. The response was great in terms of making colorful animal figurines – they look like they might be illuminated with ultraviolet light … but the only animal that could slightly be considered to be even partially constructed from a Platonic solid was the hindquarters of the bull:

Then I tried eliminating the animal element but adding iridescence; the iridescent quality of the polygon surfaces was superb in this regard, just the quality I was envisioning. However, I wanted the 5 Platonic Solids, and the AI query got 4 out of 5 right, with the icosahedron duplicated (lower center and lower right) and the octahedron replaced with what looks like a hexagonal bipyramid in the upper right of the 6 polyhedra.

I gave it another go, and the iridescence mostly went away (although still nice rainbow gradient surfaces, now with black edges), and the bipyramid corrected to an octahedron.

I think I might dust off MegaPOV (or whatever might be a good ray-tracing app for the Macintosh) and see if I can get an AI app to generate the code needed as input to a more conventional ray-tracing app to see if I can coax a bit more mathematical precision.

Any suggestions, anyone?

AI Geometric Art Tools

Sunday, 24 August 2025 by Bruce Rawles

This post will pose more questions than answers, since it seems we’re still in the “wild west” early days of popular adoption of a plethora of AI offerings, and I am hardly keeping up with all the developments in so many sectors as “everyone and their uncle” jumps on the proverbial AI bandwagon!

(I’m also in the midst of moving from Arizona back to Oregon, so this will be a quick commentary! I hope to have much more useful information, helpful resources, and examples in a future post!)

In prior posts, I’ve dabbled with some AI-generated geometric imagery:

Digital dabbling with Dall-E (early primitive experiments)
AI generated geometry – revisited a few months later (a little further along, but still nascent)

Here is an example from the more recent post:

Here is an example from the earlier post:

While the geometric imagery generated by artificial intelligence is often stunning, I typically notice that the images frequently don’t provide accurate models of precise geometric archetypes, being more oriented toward popular art and illustration than images for science, engineering, or renderings with CAD accuracy. If one looks closely, there are inconsistencies and “wonkiness” that don’t hold up to zoomed-in scrutiny if one wants the photorealism that ray-tracing software can achieve.

Do you know of websites, software, AI apps running on various platforms, browsers, devices, etc., that address this seeming void in AI functionality? I’m hoping that soon we’ll find mechanisms that assist in generating imagery with the same accuracy as ray-tracing software using precise geometric coordinates for the vertices of polyhedra, for example. If so, let me know via our contact form.

I found this web page of “AI Geometric Art Examples” by Open Art that looks promising, but when I click on the “… create …” buttons, I arrive at a more generic-looking interface. I’ll explore further when I have more time, but I’m eager to hear from readers if you’ve found good AI for geometry. Here’s a nice image from the page noted above:

I posed this query: “geometric image generation for science, engineering, renderings with CAD precision” to my browser (Brave) and got this response:

“Geometric Image Generation for Science
Recent advancements in geometric image generation for science, engineering, and high-precision renderings are increasingly focused on bridging the gap between visual data and parametric Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models. A significant development is the CADCrafter framework, which generates parametric CAD models directly from unconstrained real-world images, such as those captured by users with standard cameras.
This approach leverages a latent diffusion model conditioned on geometric features like depth and normal maps, which are invariant to texture and help mitigate the domain gap between synthetic training data and real-world images.
To ensure the generated CAD command sequences are geometrically valid, the model employs direct preference optimization (DPO) fine-tuning using feedback from an automatic CAD compiler, which acts as a code checker to categorize outputs as valid or invalid.
This method addresses the limitations of traditional generative models that produce 3D shapes with rough surfaces and indistinct edges, which lack the precision required for manufacturing and simulation.
By training solely on synthetic textureless CAD data and testing on real-world images, CADCrafter demonstrates robustness and generalization to unseen objects, even when processing single-view images.
The framework’s ability to distill knowledge from multi-view to single-view inputs enhances its accuracy and practicality for everyday applications.
Further, geometric deep learning (GDL) techniques are being applied to analyze and generate CAD data directly from complex representations like Boundary Representation (B-Rep), which encodes high-level parametric details.
GDL methods, including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Transformers, are used for tasks such as similarity analysis, retrieval, synthesis, and autocompletion of CAD models, aiming to automate repetitive design tasks and facilitate design reuse.
These methods can learn intricate geometric features from B-Rep data without converting it to formats like meshes or point clouds, thus avoiding computational expense and information loss.
For applications involving imaging data, such as microtomographic scans, fast, realistic simulations on GPUs are used to generate synthetic CT images that include realistic artefacts like beam hardening and photon noise.
These simulations are crucial for creating accurate CAD models from data affected by strong imaging artefacts, enabling precise geometric analysis of materials and structures.
The gVirtualXray (gVXR) framework exemplifies this, simulating X-ray projections and CT volumes in milliseconds on a GPU, which is orders of magnitude faster than Monte Carlo simulations, while maintaining high accuracy.
This speed enables the use of repetitive simulations for tasks like image registration and training deep-learning algorithms.
These integrated approaches—combining image-to-CAD generation, geometric deep learning, and high-fidelity simulation—represent a transformative shift towards creating precise, editable, and manufacturable digital twins from diverse data sources, significantly enhancing workflows in science, engineering, and design.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.”

(Note the now familiar disclaimer in the last line.)

Do you have suggestions for future GeometryCode.com blog posts? Please let us know; we just updated and simplified our ongoing survey here.

Details about contents of Sacred Geometry Design Sourcebook and instructions for creating the graphics therein

Saturday, 19 July 2025 by Bruce Rawles

I’m glad I reviewed some of my oldest posts, as this post (originally published January 30, 2007) needed resurrecting and updating! I will leave the details from 18 years ago mostly intact, so if you want to dive in, scroll down to the “HOW-TO” INFO STARTS HERE heading for lots of “how to” info on many of the pages to make optimum use of my first book, Sacred Geometry Design Sourcebook!

Here’s another post from my blog archives that details the contents of specific pages of my Sacred Geometry Design Sourcebook, as well as instructions on how to replicate many of the images in the book.

30Jan2007 09:17 AM Filed in: Geometry-Math

Today’s post is an email conversation I had with a visitor to the intent.com website – our first website, which has changed hands several times since the 1990s! – that I probably could have written a decade ago, so this might be useful to those of you who already have purchased a copy of the book (and thanks to all of you who have supported me in this way over the years!) There are a few other goodies on my site map that might also be of interest.

Hi Julian:

Many thanks for your inquiry. I got so involved with the reply that I’ve decided to post it on my blog for today, as well as in this email; I’m grateful that you asked the question, so now I can answer it for the world.

On 30 Jan 2007, at 6:54 AM, Julian wrote:

Dear Bruce:
I was reading your web pages about your book SACRED GEOMETRY DESIGN SOURCEBOOK, and I wondered if you could tell me whether the book provides the reader with details of how to draw the 2-D patterns for themselves or whether they are just templates without such instruction.

The simplest answer is “yes and no”, depending on which of the 1300+ images you’re referring to.

The detailed answer is – here goes! – that I cover some of the philosophy and underlying math, concepts, and archetypal ideas at the beginning of the book, and provide a
generous assortment of references in the back of the book. For the remainder (majority of the 256 pages), I give the images as much room as possible so that not only can the patterns be photocopied easily (I went with spiral binding just for that reason), so that the image quality would be as high as possible for an 8.5″ by 11″ format.

“HOW-TO” INFO STARTS HERE:

Some of the illustrations give step-by-step procedures (in graphical form, assuming some basic familiarity with how to use a compass and straightedge, such as:

page 44 (showing how “unit cells” for the tiling patterns can be used to create an enormously expanded variety of additional patterns by recognizing how the space-filling shapes can be varied; this applies to the “unit cell” examples on pages 16-43,

page 45 (showing how each of the patterns on pages 16-43 can be embellished with fractal or other inscribed detail for each of the polygons for an infinite (literally!) variety of possible variations, which also apply to the majority of the remaining images in the book; page 237 gives a 3D example of this),

pages 46-84 have either explicit (most of these pages) or simple to observe implicit “unit cells” which show how these can be created in a great variety of ways,

page 84 (Pentagon Rotation Grid) gives the 73.2% proportion crucial to the exact construction of this pattern,

page 85 (Genesis of the Seed of Life) shows the step-by-step “compass only” construction of this important and universal pattern,

page 86-95 (variations on Seed of Life and Flower of Life) show how once the Seed of Life is constructed, many other patterns can be easily derived – Flower of Life, Hexagonal Grid, 2nd Harmonic Overlay which is used in Mika Feinberg’s beautiful LightSOURCE screensaver animation (no longer available); see my links (resources) page, Tree of Life, Fruit of Life, Heart and Ankh matrices, recursions, Metatron’s Cube, etc.,

page 95: since the Dodecahedron is the most complicated shape to derive from Metatron’s cube, the top center illustration on this page shows which vertices are used to create the “dodecahedron 2D shadow” with small circles highlighted in the larger image,

page 96: The general instructions for creating Nested Inscribed Polygons appear on this page,

pages 100-101-102: other examples of the crucial proportions needed to create these images either by hand or with a computer graphics program; numerous pages provide these instructions in the text without detracting from the space given to the images,

pages 104-105, 110-113, 123-124, 128, 130, 138-139, 144-145, 155, 163, 166, 171, 176-180, 182-187: all have instructions and details on how to create the images,

page 146: very detailed step-by-step instructions for inscribing a pentagon within a circle,

page 147: very detailed step-by-step instructions for inscribing a pentagon starting from one side of a given length,

page 156: very detailed step-by-step instructions for creating a golden rectangle (including “whirling squares and more),

page 156: very detailed step-by-step instructions for dividing a line by the golden ratio,

page 157: very detailed mathematical information about golden ratio progressions and powers, illustrated graphically,

page 188: shows how the Parthenon at the Acropolis in Athens, Greece, incorporates the golden ratio,

page 189: an amazing amount of data on this page about the Great Pyramid at Giza, Egypt showing phi (golden ratio) and pi proportions, and the proportions of the so-called “King’s Chamber” although the so-called “sarcophagus” (granite box) within is too large to fit through the only passage leading into that chamber, which violates the generally accepted funerary rite theory,

page 190: the classic “Measure of Man” (Vitruvian Man) by Leonardo daVinci, copied around the world, showing the golden ratio proportions in the human body,

page 191: the only known CAD drawing adaptation (to my knowledge) of Leonardo’s “Ideal Church” sketch,

page 192: detailed specifics about the Shoemaker’s Knife of Archimedes, giving several variations all showing the mathematical principle,

page 194: details of the geometry of the classic 1991 Barbury Castle, England crop circle formation,

page 195 and page 52: the details of the geometry encoded in the Sri Yantra (a classic Hindu mandala) and the cross section of the Great Pyramid at Giza, Egypt (also the “squaring the circle” conundrum), both with a 1-Phi-Square Root of Phi triangle which has a 51 degree, 51 minute slope,

page 196: numerous details common to the 5 Platonic and 13 Archimedean Solids,

pages 197-214; numerous details specific to the 5 Platonic and 13 Archimedean Solids, including how the insphere/intersphere/circumsphere/side length proportions are calculated,

pages 215-224: similar details specific to the 4 Kepler-Poinsot solids, the Star Tetrahedron (a.k.a. Stella Octangula) and related polyhedra,

pages 225-229: numerous graphics showing how the Platonic Solids relate to each other in a myriad of fascinating (awe-inspiring, really!) ways,

pages 230-235: numerous relationships between 3D polyhedra with 5-sided symmetry and the “shadow” they cast on a decagon (10-sided polygon), with construction details,

page 236: step-by-step instructions on creating an accurate drawing of the Icosahedron and Dodecahedron starting from a Golden Rectangle,

pages 237-255: generous appendices for hands-on explorers of all ages and levels of experience, including tables and charts of regular polygon angles, apothem, radius and side ratios and areas, radius ratios by coordination number for Ionic Chemical Bonding (which relates to properties of materials at the molecular and planetary levels), Fibonacci Numbers, Perfect Right Triangles (when I put the book together, I wasn’t aware of the Phi-1/Phi-Square Root of 3 Right Triangle that Mike Green of British Columbia introduced me to), Prime Numbers, extensive tables with all sorts of data on the Platonic and Archimedean Solids (useful for a variety of purposes, including model construction and computer simulation and animation, a map of planet Earth showing superimposed Platonic Solid Vertex Latitudes and (example) Longitudes, a fun stereogram with 6 Small Stellated Dodecahedra (there, I gave the clue a short bio of myself, 3 pages of bibliography (more on my books and links pages and blog), and unique graphical index to all the illustrations in the book. Whew! I’d almost forgotten how much I packed into this labor of love over a decade ago!

Many of the 1300+ images are somewhat self-explanatory graphically (especially if you have created the basic shapes like the Seed of Life, Golden Rectangle, and a few others by hand with compass and straight-edge, which I highly recommend for anyone, as mentor Keith Critchlow so aptly reminded me when reviewing my original manuscript)…

… and of course, if you find re-creating one of the patterns challenging, I’d be happy to answer other questions via email so that I can share with other enthusiasts; thanks for asking!